Hello,

I think it is a good idea for there to be a search extension for pubsub.

One thing to keep in mind would be is that the extension could become really complicated depending on the search fields that you are going to have and the type of filter you want. If there are user defined fields, then special care should be had not to make the stanza cumbersome.

An idea you can implement for instance, to make it more compact, is to use fields defined in other namespaces, so in essence you'd be searching a particular XEP namespace (for exampleurn:xmpp:jingle:apps:file-transfer:4) and you could reuse to fields instead of redefining then. Of course you would still need to have user defined fields as I don't think that searching namespaces would handle all use cases.

Good luck,

For reference you can have a look at: XEP-055

On 06/01/16 07:08, Goffi wrote:
G'day,

MAM is a great tool which solves several problems for messages management. It
also offers the ability to get items from a PubSub node when the "node"
attribute is used.

We have implemented this feature in our PubSub/PEP component, and I haven't
seen any other implementation for PubSub so far (if you know any, please tell
me).

But I have to say that MAM is really badly adapted to PubSub, here are the
major reasons:

- All items a returned in separate <message> stanza, wrapped in a <forwarded>
element, one item per stanza. This both is a waste of bandwidth and make the
task more difficult for the client as it must track each <message> and the <iq>
result to known when a page has been received. A simple <iq> query like for a
PubSub items retrieval would be much more better.

- Requests are made on one node. But it is desirable to be able to do requests
on several nodes, or on nodes which match a pattern. For instance, in XEP-0277
comments node are in the form
"urn:xmpp:microblog:0:comments/dd88c9bc58886fce0049ed050df0c5f2" and it would
be usefull to request all items from a node starting with
"urn:xmpp:microblog:0:comments". With MAM I can't request all comments
published by Romeo.

- this one could be easily fixed, but currently we can't do filtering on PEP
without requesting a particular jid. With microblog, we want to be able to
request e.g. all items with the category/tag "XMPP" regardless of the author.

- There is no way when a service offer MAM both for message and PubSub (e.g.: a
MUC component with PubSub abilities (MUC 2 ?), or the server itself when it
offers PEP) to know if the filtering fields apply to messages, or PubSub, or
both.
Look at section 4.1.5 "Retrieving form fields", how can I know if
"urn:example:xmpp:free-text-search" can be used for PubSub or not?

- section 4.2 says that "The archive results MUST be sorted in chronological
order", that totally make sense for message archives, but in the case of
PubSub this is incoherent with the classic items retrieval ordering (most
recent item first), and we may want to sort on other fields than publication
date: for instance item updating date vs publishing date, or size of files
tracked with pubsub.
Of course we can reverse order easily with RSM, but though it's not natural,
and we can't sort on other fields.

- overall, PubSub already manages archives by design, but it is lacking a good
searching tool. Even if it is tempting to use MAM with PubSub because we can
have filtering "for free", I really think it is not adapted at all, and PubSub
deserve a real dedicated searching/filtering tool.

If other people are interested, I would like to work on a "PubSub searching"
protoXEP. PubSub will probably be the core of many major features in XMPP in
the future, so we need a good, generic, and extendable way to search/filter
items.

Regards
Goffi

_______________________________________________
Standards mailing list
Info: http://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/standards
Unsubscribe: standards-unsubscr...@xmpp.org
_______________________________________________

_______________________________________________
Standards mailing list
Info: http://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/standards
Unsubscribe: standards-unsubscr...@xmpp.org
_______________________________________________

Reply via email to