Le mercredi 20 janvier 2016, 19:43:30 Dave Cridland a écrit : > On 20 January 2016 at 16:43, Goffi <go...@goffi.org> wrote: > [...] > > 3) When you're back online, the chatroom might even send the notification > *then*, rather like a lot of bots do now. > > Still, all this thinking obviously means I think we should formalize > "mentions" into protocol, so +1 to this spec, even if I think we need to > add in the formalized mention as well as the notification.
There is a point I haven't said so far, it is that I plan to propose (probably after Fosdem) an other protoXEP to indicate to server how to handle offline notifications. Right now if I have a mention and I'm online, it's alright I can display it to the user. If I'm offline, only the server know that I have a notification. So I want to be able to tell to the server « when I'm offline and I have this kind of notification, send me an email [or something else], when I'm online, I'll handle it myself thanks » The reason I want to make a generic option server side, is that I want to handle PubSub notifications in addition to mentions: e.g. I want to be able to say to my server « I want an email when somebody reply to a comment and I'm not online, but I don't want notification if somebody mention me ». Also the server can know user email address thanks to vcard. So it make more sense for me to handle offline notification on the server rather than on components. ++ Goffi _______________________________________________ Standards mailing list Info: http://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/standards Unsubscribe: standards-unsubscr...@xmpp.org _______________________________________________
