> On 21 Mar 2016, at 14:14, Dave Cridland <d...@cridland.net> wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> On 21 March 2016 at 14:06, Kevin Smith <kevin.sm...@isode.com> wrote:
> 
> > On 21 Mar 2016, at 11:48, Daniel Gultsch <dan...@gultsch.de> wrote:
> >
> > An update to the 'arbitrary attributes' feature request. Even more 
> > important than the before mentioned content-type, content-length and so 
> > forth are probably description and a thumbnail. Information which can be 
> > extracted for example by the means of open graph [1] meta tags from a lot 
> > of websites.
> >
> > This would allow for a proper link preview like slack, skype and so forth 
> > are doing.
> >
> > Kev: When questioning this. Is your concern that you don't want the 
> > attributes to be completely arbitrary? Do you want them to be well-defined? 
> > (Having a set list of like content-type, description, thumbnail, 
> > content-length and so forth?) Or would you rather not have attributes like 
> > this in this XEP at all?
> 
> It’s a concern with the attributes being completely arbitrary (how does one 
> know which they need to support? discovery starts being a bit of a nuisance). 
> Non-abritrary data form elements could be reasonable - there’s still a 
> discoverability question, but it might be ok. Would you like to propose 
> something? I’ve not had the cycles since the summit to take much more of a 
> look at References.
> 
> 
> I don't think there's any fundamental difference between arbitrary namespaced 
> child elements and a data form, except that a data form is more restrictive 
> and lends itself well to human interaction. I don't think we have any human 
> interaction here. So why a data form and not just allow namespaced child 
> elements, which can be ignored by recipients that don't understand them?
> 
> (Note that I often dislike data forms in machine-driven protocol work, but 
> this case seems particularly unsuited).

This is entirely fair, and so do I.

/K
_______________________________________________
Standards mailing list
Info: http://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/standards
Unsubscribe: standards-unsubscr...@xmpp.org
_______________________________________________

Reply via email to