2016-05-17 9:40 GMT+02:00 Daniel Gultsch <dan...@gultsch.de>: > A quick fix for this would be to send the same presence but from the bare > jid. (the jid attribute in the payload can still give the user away) (That > is of course if the recipient is allowed to view the real jid (either > because they are admin or because the room is non anonymous) > > Maybe if people think a presence is not the right stanza the same > announcement could be made with a message. >
Thinking about it it has to be message stanza because subsequent presences from the rooms bare jid informing about the affiliation change would get eaten by CSI. I'm happy to create a PR for the MUC XEP if there is interest in that. cheers Daniel
_______________________________________________ Standards mailing list Info: http://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/standards Unsubscribe: standards-unsubscr...@xmpp.org _______________________________________________
