Le vendredi 9 septembre 2016, 09:00:48 CEST Sam Whited a écrit : > On Fri, Sep 9, 2016 at 4:18 AM, Goffi <go...@goffi.org> wrote: > > but the bad side is that it is not XML, so a client would > > need a specific parser (the basic information are not difficult to parse > > though). > > I'm unsure of the state of this, but it may be worth a look: > https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6321 > > (although it's probably easier to use normal iCal format because many > libraries already exist to prase it) > > —Sam
Oh thanks, didn't knew about it, it may make more sense in XMPP context. So I'm not sure now which version suit the best, I actually think standardised XML version make more sense. If we go this way would it be better to do a new XEP and deprecate the former one or to update the XEP-0097? I think a new one would actually be better. Goffi
_______________________________________________ Standards mailing list Info: https://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/standards Unsubscribe: standards-unsubscr...@xmpp.org _______________________________________________
