On Fri, Jan 6, 2017 at 10:24 AM, Steve Kille <steve.ki...@isode.com> wrote: > A key problem with this is the JIDs then become anonymous to the channel > management. > > Having a situation where channel participants do not know who is in a channel > is fine. I think that in many situations, it will be beneficial for > administration to know real JIDs. Would you really want to have the XSF > Room/Channel full of burner JIDs? Consider if I try to join the > channel with a burner JID and nick of "Sam Whited".
If the MIX service is issuing burner JIDs then it could refuse to issue new burner JIDs to a user if one of that users burner JIDs has been banned (or simply refuse to allow future burner JIDs issued to that user into that specific room if they weren't banned from the whole service), so in a way this could provide "fully anonymous" rooms where even channel administration does not know the persons real JID (only the MIX service and its administrators do), but can still ban that JID. If the original JID should actually be known by channel administrators (the semi-anonymous model), the MIX service could publish the users real JID to a JID mapping node that can only be accessed by channel admins. —Sam -- Sam Whited pub 4096R/54083AE104EA7AD3 _______________________________________________ Standards mailing list Info: https://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/standards Unsubscribe: standards-unsubscr...@xmpp.org _______________________________________________
