Hello all.

SHA-1 is used in many places throughout XMPP. Examples include authentication 
mechanisms (SCRAM-SHA-1) and entity capabilities (XEP-0115), for instance. 
Concerning the recent report about vulnerabilities found in SHA-1, should there 
be an effort to upgrade all these to SHA-256 or later?

Best regards,

Peter Waher

Ref:
https://www.wired.com/2017/02/common-cryptographic-tool-turns-majorly-insecure/

[https://www.wired.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/Cryptography-2x1-1200x630-e1487801673377.jpg]<https://www.wired.com/2017/02/common-cryptographic-tool-turns-majorly-insecure/>

A Super-Common Crypto Tool Turns Out to Be 
Super-Insecure<https://www.wired.com/2017/02/common-cryptographic-tool-turns-majorly-insecure/>
www.wired.com
NIST has been warning about vulnerabilities in its SHA-1 cryptographic hash 
function for years, but some services still use it and the threats are growing.



_______________________________________________
Standards mailing list
Info: https://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/standards
Unsubscribe: standards-unsubscr...@xmpp.org
_______________________________________________

Reply via email to