On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 11:34 AM, Christian Schudt <christian.sch...@gmx.de> wrote: > The only difference I see is, that the document now explicitly mentions the > base64 encoding, but I think it was clear enough before (due to samples). > Is that worth a namespace bump? Are there any interoperability issues > otherwise?
There were several XEPs (mostly in Jingle land, I think?) that used hex encoding and so were incompatible with other XEPs using base64. Doing a bump makes it explicit that you MUST be using base64 if you support that namespace. —Sam _______________________________________________ Standards mailing list Info: https://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/standards Unsubscribe: standards-unsubscr...@xmpp.org _______________________________________________
