On 30 March 2017 at 16:00, Florian Schmaus <f...@geekplace.eu> wrote: > On 30.03.2017 15:54, Remko Tronçon wrote: >> On 30 March 2017 at 15:10, Andreas Straub <a...@strb.org >> <mailto:a...@strb.org>> wrote: >> You raise a valid point. I agree that this construction seems >> cleaner from a purely theoretical standpoint. >> >> Permissible implementations of XEdDSA may or may not emerge, but as long >> as it is not something available, you're taking a risk of making a >> standard that will never be adopted. >> … >> I agree that losing the audit is a downside, but I'm not sure if the >> alternative is realistic if you want your XEP to take off. > > I'm under the impression that OMEMO already took off. So I don't share > the concern that libsignal being GPL hinders adoption in any way.
The XSF does open standards, available to any implementer without restriction, not just GPL software. > > - Florian > > > _______________________________________________ > Standards mailing list > Info: https://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/standards > Unsubscribe: standards-unsubscr...@xmpp.org > _______________________________________________ > _______________________________________________ Standards mailing list Info: https://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/standards Unsubscribe: standards-unsubscr...@xmpp.org _______________________________________________
