On 4/1/17 7:39 PM, Stephen Paul Weber wrote: > Messages coming from a server or component may reasonably have no > resource part, since you're not communicating with a particular > "connected session" as with a client, but with the component itself. > > However, say this component has a reason to describe its presence and > allow subscriptions to its presence? Is it reasonable to send > > <presence from="component.example.com" to="[email protected]" /> > > in response to probes?
Sure. > I have looked through both Core and XMPP-IM and > it doesn't seem clear to me if this is allowed. There is a strong > assumption in the language that presence comes from a "resource", but > also language like "entity or resource" which implies it might be > resonable to have resource-less presence, at least so far as the > standard is concerned. Most of the text about presence in the RFCs is about device or endpoint or client presence, thus your confusion. Peter _______________________________________________ Standards mailing list Info: https://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/standards Unsubscribe: [email protected] _______________________________________________
