On 21.08.2017 16:20, Philipp Hancke wrote: > <snip/> > >> What do you think? > > +1 -- this was actually the intent of adding <hash/> during > session-initiate in 0.16. But the wording of this is a bit weird: > > One or more <hash/> elements MUST be present when offering a file, but > those elements MAY be empty if the hash has not yet been computed.
Doesn't that violate XEP-0300 ยง 3 """ The CDATA of the <hash/> element MUST conform to the base64Binary datatype.. """ Paul and I wondered if it would be better to use another element for hash algorithm signalling (vs. hash value signalling). That's why #497 ended up with <hash-used/>. - Florian _______________________________________________ Standards mailing list Info: https://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/standards Unsubscribe: standards-unsubscr...@xmpp.org _______________________________________________
