On 09.01.2018 12:08, Evgeny Khramtsov wrote: > Tue, 9 Jan 2018 11:55:15 +0100 > Florian Schmaus <f...@geekplace.eu> wrote: > >> A client supporting xep368 but not ALPN would > > This sounds like asking for troubles ;) Since one of the use case of > XEP-0368 is multiplexing and you cannot do this easily without ALPN. > >> 2. xep368 makes ALPN mandatory > > ^^^ This. Not sure why it's not mandatory though.
To be fair, it is currently a SHOULD in xep368. - Florian
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Standards mailing list Info: https://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/standards Unsubscribe: standards-unsubscr...@xmpp.org _______________________________________________
