On 18 Jan 2018, at 08:28, Dave Cridland <[email protected]> wrote: > 1) Roll Call > Kev sent apologies; his votes will be on list.
Enclosed. > 3) ProtoXEP - User Invitations > Daniel and Sam on-list, Georg and Dave +1. > Kev on-list. Which is https://xmpp.org/extensions/inbox/user-invite.html I assume. Not blocking this (+1), but the addition of fields into IBR seems wrong - don’t we have xep4 in IBR for this reason? > 4) XEP-0286, Advance to Active > > All present +1. > > Kev on-list. I’ll abstain/+0 this one, only because no-one at all felt the need to support it in the LC (that I could find in my archives). > 5) https://github.com/xsf/xeps/pull/554 > > Sam on-list, others +1. > > Kev on-list. +1, natch. > > 6) https://github.com/xsf/xeps/pull/557 > > Council decided to vote in the absence of further list discussion. > > All present in favour, Kev to vote on list. +1 > 7) XEP-0387, Advance to Draft > > Note this is without addressing Kev's outstanding feedback. > > Sam, Georg, Daniel +1 > > Dave 0 (Specifically, felt it was pointless moving forward without > addressing or merging Kev's PR, but felt it was Kev's decision to make > here). > > Kev on-list. I’m +1 once my PR addressing the outstanding list feedback is merged. (Technically the vote shouldn't have happened until after the LC feedback was addressed, but I suppose it doesn’t really matter the order as long as both things happen) /K _______________________________________________ Standards mailing list Info: https://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/standards Unsubscribe: [email protected] _______________________________________________
