On Montag, 12. Februar 2018 08:45:23 CET Evgeny Khramtsov wrote: > Mon, 12 Feb 2018 00:41:54 +0100 > > Christian Schudt <christian.sch...@gmx.de> wrote: > > - I am also missing a cache which maps entities to capabilities, i.e. > > JIDs to disco#info objects. This is the whole point of the XEP (to be > > able to know an entity’s abilities without service discovery). This > > cache should be probably be non-persistent. The "Capability Hash > > Cache“ (hash -> disco#info) is actually only the > > intermediate/auxiliary cache. > > I think the XEP doesn't solve the main problem of cache invalidation > and that's why I think it's pointless and I'm not going to implement it > until the invalidating rules are described.
Could you please be specific which cache you’d like to see properly invalidated? Do you mean the (hash -> disco#info) cache or the (entity JID -> hash / disco#info) cache? kind regards, Jonas
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Standards mailing list Info: https://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/standards Unsubscribe: standards-unsubscr...@xmpp.org _______________________________________________
