Fri, 23 Mar 2018 20:57:41 +0000 Kevin Smith <kevin.sm...@isode.com> wrote:
> Thanks for the review, comments follow (I’ve elided trivial points). > > On 20 Mar 2018, at 16:34, Florian Schmaus <f...@geekplace.eu> wrote: > > As of now MIX is bloated and got way out of hand. > > I’m not sure to what extent this is true, but I’m going to go through > and see what can be simplified. I think the core of the XEP should not rely on ad-hoc services: the whole protocol should re-use existing pubsub spec. For relaying messages this would be enough. Other stuff like presence management, jid proxy, access rules and other nerdy features should go into an ad-hoc service and should be described in a separate document. > MIX is a very simple core concept XEP-0136 had also a very simple concept. > and I’m not entirely sure how we’ve got to the current situation > where it’s viewed as complex The XEP is 91 pages long. Even reading it will take a day. _______________________________________________ Standards mailing list Info: https://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/standards Unsubscribe: standards-unsubscr...@xmpp.org _______________________________________________
