On 10.04.2018 15:08, Georg Lukas wrote: > * Georg Lukas <ge...@op-co.de> [2017-10-04 10:21]: >> 2. Create a new, explicit am-I-joined IQ that a client can send to the >> MUC JID. > > This seems to be the winner of the discussion from last October, even > though it was qualified as a "sticking plaster". > > To keep with the "sticking plaster" qualification, I propose to > implement it as an XEP-0199 ping to the participant's own full-JID: > > ``` > <iq from='jul...@capulet.lit/balcony' > to='co...@chat.shakespeare.lit/thirdwitch' id='c2s1' type='get'> > <ping xmlns='urn:xmpp:ping'/> > </iq> > ``` > (assuming here that Juliet is [impersonating] the third witch in the MUC) > > The MUC would then intercept the <ping/> and respond directly, instead > of routing the IQ to a random resource of Juliet's. If Juliet is joined > as 'thirdwitch', the MUC will directly respond with a result IQ.
That's probably fine. > If > Juliet is not joined, the MUC will respond with <not-acceptable/>. I feel like this is missing "or if the ping request does not originate from Juliet". Or is this intentional? I personally would probably not re-use xep199 for this, but define new IQ. That is mostly because I don't know which two code paths you mean here: > - clients don't need two different code paths depending on a > 'self-ping-supported' feature Care to elaborate? - Florian _______________________________________________ Standards mailing list Info: https://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/standards Unsubscribe: standards-unsubscr...@xmpp.org _______________________________________________
