On 1 Jun 2018, at 11:37, Steve Kille <steve.ki...@isode.com> wrote: > 1. Use variant 2 for messages. Messages will come from bare JID of > channel, with resource being stable ID indicating the sender. Sender JID > and Nick in the message. This works right for MAM, and I think it is > reasonably natural for messages to always come from the channel JID. > > 2. Use variant 1 for presence. The presence will come from a JID that > encodes both channel and stable ID. Sender JID and Nick carried inside the > presence. This means that the From: in the presence bare JID reflects the > participant rather than the channel.
It’s not immediately clear to me which processing this makes easier. Clearly a client *can* do the mangling from one to the other with precious little effort, but what does the inconsistency buy us? /K _______________________________________________ Standards mailing list Info: https://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/standards Unsubscribe: standards-unsubscr...@xmpp.org _______________________________________________
