On 8/8/18 2:05 PM, Matthew Wild wrote: > And another question... (for Ralph? :) ) > > There are some cases which are not clear regarding the permission model. > > These two things contradict for example: > > Table 1: "Affiliations and their Privileges" states that entities with > affiliation "none" may not retrieve items. > > Table 6: "Node Access Models" states that for "open" nodes (which it > says SHOULD be the default), "any entity may retrieve items from the > node". > > Would it be fair to say that for an "open" node, an unaffiliated > entity would have the same permissions as a "member" would on a more > closed node?
Yes. Intuitively, it makes sense that on a more closed node (e.g., where subscriptions need to be authorized), there is a difference between "member" and "none". But that distinction doesn't apply to a node with an open access model. HTH, Peter
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Standards mailing list Info: https://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/standards Unsubscribe: standards-unsubscr...@xmpp.org _______________________________________________
