Yes, I think a distinct feature is needed, and that feature should indicate support for the optimisation in §3.3.
On Fri, 14 Dec 2018 at 15:01, Georg Lukas <ge...@op-co.de> wrote: > Hello, > > I'd like to ask for a Last Call for XEP-0410. It's got implemented in > two clients and two servers so far: > > - poezio 0.12 > - yaxim 0.9.3 > - ejabberd 18.12 > - prosody 0.11 > > One question that was brought up recently is whether a MUC service > should advertise support for the self-ping optimization > <https://xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0410.html#serveroptimization>, and > whether <feature var='urn:xmpp:ping'/> should be used for that. > > As this is only an optimization that doesn't change the protocol, I > don't see an urgent need to advertise it, but maybe there are use cases > I haven't anticipated. If this is wished for, it should have its own > feature tag ("optimizes self-pings") and not use urn:xmpp:ping > ("supports XEP-0199 pings") IMO. Opinions? > > > Georg > -- > || http://op-co.de ++ GCS d--(++) s: a C+++ UL+++ !P L+++ !E W+++ N ++ > || gpg: 0x962FD2DE || o? K- w---() O M V? PS+ PE-- Y++ PGP+ t+ 5 R+ || > || Ge0rG: euIRCnet || X(+++) tv+ b+(++) DI+++ D- G e++++ h- r++ y? || > ++ IRCnet OFTC OPN ||_________________________________________________|| > _______________________________________________ > Standards mailing list > Info: https://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/standards > Unsubscribe: standards-unsubscr...@xmpp.org > _______________________________________________ >
_______________________________________________ Standards mailing list Info: https://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/standards Unsubscribe: standards-unsubscr...@xmpp.org _______________________________________________
