On Wed, 3 Apr 2019 at 15:34, Melvin Keskin <me...@olomono.de> wrote: > You wrote in your first message on ATT: > > This alone is absolutely not a blocker to adoption in my view. > > Then I read: > > -1 - I don't think there's evidence of this being anything beyond a > > very > > high-level sketch. Designing a cryptographic trust system is complex, > > and > > I'm not convinced we have the expertise to adequately do such a > > thing. > > I am confused now because I thought you would accept ATT but it needs > more improvement. What did you mean by "This alone is absolutely not a > blocker to adoption in my view."? >
I said, roughly: * This specification is just a high-level sketch. * But this is creating our own cryptography, and the XSF should not be doing that. The first is not a blocker. The second, I think, is. Dave.
_______________________________________________ Standards mailing list Info: https://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/standards Unsubscribe: standards-unsubscr...@xmpp.org _______________________________________________
