On Mon, 29 Jul 2019 at 02:15, Tedd Sterr <teddst...@outlook.com> wrote:
> *2019-07-10 (expired 2019-07-24)* > > PASSED (-0:1:+4) > *PR #797 - XEP-0128: Remove 'unlikely' statement* - > https://github.com/xsf/xeps/pull/797 > Dave: +1 > Georg: +1 (looks straight-forward; pretty sure it's not a breaking change) > Jonas: +1 > Kev: [abstained] > Link: +1 > > PASSED (-0:1:+4) > *PR #796 - XEP-0368: clarify what happens when a `.` target is published* > - > https://github.com/xsf/xeps/pull/796 > Dave: +1 > Georg: +1 (this is just a clarification of RFC 2782) > Jonas: +1 > Kev: [abstained] > Link: +1 (definitely!) > > > *2019-07-17 (expiring 2019-07-31)* > > *Proposed XMPP Extension: Anonymous unique occupant identifiers for MUCs* > - > https://xmpp.org/extensions/inbox/occupant-id.html > Dave: [pending] > Georg: +1 (would rather see occupant IDs in the form of JIDs, maybe even > passed in a 'jid' attribute in the XEP-0045 item tag) > Jonas: +1 > Kev: [pending] > Link: +1 > > +0 - I won't block this, but I'm concerned that we're introducing a new identifier form for endpoint entities, which feels pretty rough, > *Proposed XMPP Extension: Message Reactions* - > https://xmpp.org/extensions/inbox/reactions.html > Dave: [pending] > Georg: +0 (for now; still undecided) > Jonas: +1 (details can be ironed out) > Kev: [pending] > Link: +1 (issues can be ironed out before Draft) > > +1 - Enthusiastic about the problem space, but my crystal ball suggests this will need a lot of changes on the way to Draft. > _______________________________________________ > Standards mailing list > Info: > https://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/standards > Unsubscribe: standards-unsubscr...@xmpp.org > _______________________________________________ >
_______________________________________________ Standards mailing list Info: https://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/standards Unsubscribe: standards-unsubscr...@xmpp.org _______________________________________________
