On 7 Sep 2019, at 14:17, Daniel Gultsch <dan...@gultsch.de> wrote: > > Am Sa., 7. Sept. 2019 um 13:05 Uhr schrieb Andrew Nenakhov > <andrew.nenak...@redsolution.com>: >> >> Seems like a copy of XEP-0367 Message Attaching. It also shares the same >> problem: no explanation whatsoever on how to fetch these attachments from a >> Message Archive in any efficient way. Ideally, we should retrieve a message >> from an archive with all its attachments. We should also have some kind of >> notification on reconnecting that a previously received message >> received/updated an attachment (or attachments) while we were offline. >> >> Without some kind of plan to deal with these issues, any discussion about >> attachments will result in half-baked XEP that can only be implemented on >> hardcore 'traditional' clients that enjoy a persistent connection. > > I agree that any fastening/attaching/referencing XEP with the implied > intent of making collective retrieval from MAM possible should also > specify (or at least be released simultaneously with a XEP that does) > said retrieval. Both to make the intent of the XEP clear and to make > sure that the generic mechanism really is generic enough to handle > that.
In an ideal world, I don’t disagree with you. In this instance my aim was to get Fastening out ASAP so Reactions could be rebased on it and unblocked. But I do see archive access in my near future now. /K _______________________________________________ Standards mailing list Info: https://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/standards Unsubscribe: standards-unsubscr...@xmpp.org _______________________________________________
