On 4 Mar 2020, at 10:00, Daniel Gultsch <dan...@gultsch.de> wrote: > > I’d like to get some more feedback (from more than 2 people) before I > rewrite vast parts of the XEP. > The XEP talks a lot about copy pasting one avatar to the other instead > of feeding them both from the same data storage. > To the user both approaches might provide very similar results but > when it comes to the access model there is an important difference: > One checks the access model once on publication; the other one > essentially modifies 0153 in that it imposes the access model of 84 on > 0153 on every read. While I totally get how and why this is desirable > I think there is no denying in that it changes how 0153 work without > telling users who only know about 0153. I find that controversial and > would like to have more feedback on that.
I think the concerns raised about ACL are valid. If I configure a pubsub node to be private and publish something to it, it likely shouldn’t then appear in another public data store. So at a minimum not doing the propagation from pubsub to vcard if the node has been configured to not be public would seem to make sense to me. /K _______________________________________________ Standards mailing list Info: https://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/standards Unsubscribe: standards-unsubscr...@xmpp.org _______________________________________________
