On Fri, 13 Mar 2020 at 23:47, Tedd Sterr <teddst...@outlook.com> wrote:
> http://logs.xmpp.org/council/2020-03-11?p=h#2020-03-11-8d229823ff2ec504 > > *1) Roll Call* > Present: Zash, Jonas, Georg, Daniel > Apologies: Dave > > *2) Agenda Bashing* > Nothing to add. > > *3) Editor's Update* > * ProtoXEP: Reminders > * Expired calls: CFE on XEP-0066 > * Calls in progress: > - CFE: XEP-0184 (Message Delivery Receipts), ends: 2020-03-17 > > *4) Advance XEP-0066 (Out of Band Data)* - > https://xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0066.html > Daniel: -1 (very little feedback) > Jonas: -1 (a few sensible points brought up on-list - those should be > addressed first) > Georg: -1 (missed the CFE; pretty sure it's not There Yet) > Zash: -1 (eh) > Dave: [pending] > > -0 - While I think the objections by others are sensible I'll avoid holding a -1 against this and trust the judgement of others on when to allow it to advance. > Daniel thinks there seems to be a general lack of feedback on XEPs, and > wonders why that is - does the community not know this is important? Jonas > suggests discussing this in AOB. > > *5) Outstanding Votes* > There are votes to made, though the one about to expire is vetoed anyway; > see the Spreadsheet of Doom [1] for more details. > > *6) Date of Next* > 2020-03-18 1600 UTC > > [For those who have recently participated in the customary bi-annual clock > fiddling, this will appear to be one hour later than usual; normality shall > resume after the 29th, when Europe catches up.] > > *7) AOB* > Jonas was under the impression that there was above-average feedback > during this LC/CFE spree; Daniel had been hoping for more feedback on > XEP-0066 (Out of Band Data) and XEP-0398 (User Avatar to vCard-Based > Avatars Conversion) - Jonas agrees that the amount of feedback was pretty > low on these. > Jonas is unsure how to find out the reasons for the lack of feedback. > [Suggestion welcome.] > > Daniel would like to inform Council that the OMEMO issues should be > resolved now - the GPL situation has been resolved, and there are more > authors who are willing to incorporate feedback. Jonas had noted the > extensive update, and is pleased to see that it now uses SCE. > Indeed, many thanks. > Pep adds that, although the specification is no longer bound to the GPL, > this doesn't necessarily mean that libraries are no longer under GPL > (anyone wanting a non-GPL implementation may be required to do some work > themselves). > Not that this would matter even if it were the case, but my understanding is that taking Olm as a startpoint there is not much work to do. > > *8) Close* > Thanks all > > [1] > https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1ANu9KGmNf2r-qpLYqF7NdJTtqA1GIu55rf2deKbM0GA > > _______________________________________________ > Standards mailing list > Info: https://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/standards > Unsubscribe: standards-unsubscr...@xmpp.org > _______________________________________________ >
_______________________________________________ Standards mailing list Info: https://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/standards Unsubscribe: standards-unsubscr...@xmpp.org _______________________________________________
