Updated change-list after PR update:
- RFC 5245 is replaced with RFC 8445 - Introduced ice2 transport attribute for backward compatibility - Clarified ICE restart procedure - remote-candidate is now MUST to mimic ICE SDP RFC - Now remote-candidate is sent on media stream established for all components at once - Wrong reference to RFC 6455 was replaced with correct one: RFC 6544 Best Regards, Sergey вт, 17 мар. 2020 г. в 12:54, Sergey Ilinykh <rion...@gmail.com>: > > who is implementing 8445? > > > > Firefox only implements aggressive nomination. > > https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1034964 has some details. > > Does it matter? Do you think the new standard is going to be abandoned? > Do you think XMPP should implement the standard only after other big > players? > But if the compatibility matters a lot for this deferred XEP, maybe ice:0 > vs ice:1 > in the namespace is a good indicator. In this case maybe it's good to > split the PR into two > (rfc-related and remote-candidates), and maybe add some disco features. > wdyt? > > > remote-candidate is a very sip-ish concept not even implemented by > webrtc.org. > > But the idea behind is applicable to XMPP. Why shouldn't we take it? I > don't like those MAY/SHOULD etc, > they add a lot of complexity to the code. If ICE SDP says MUST, I think it > has to be MUST for us too > since we are trying to mimic SDP everywhere. > > > I don't think bumping the namespace is practical until deployment is > more wide-spread. > > I can agree here. But it would be nice to hear more thoughts from those > who already implemented this XEP. > > > вт, 17 мар. 2020 г. в 12:14, Philipp Hancke <fi...@goodadvice.pages.de>: > >> Am 12.03.20 um 22:30 schrieb Sergey Ilinykh: >> > https://github.com/xsf/xeps/pull/905 >> > >> > PR Changes: >> > >> > 1. RFC 5245 is replaced with RFC 8445 >> >> who is implementing 8445? >> >> > 2. Aggressive nomination is not supported anymore >> >> Firefox only implements aggressive nomination. >> https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1034964 has some details. >> >> > 3. remote-candidate is now MUST to mimic ICE SDP RFC >> > 4. Now remote-candidate has to be send for all components at once >> when >> > ICE for media stream has completed >> >> remote-candidate is a very sip-ish concept not even implemented by >> webrtc.org. >> >> > 5. Namespace version was updated because of incompatible changes >> >> I don't think bumping the namespace is practical until deployment is >> more wide-spread. >> >> > 6. Wrong reference to RFC 6455 was replaced with correct one: RFC >> 6544 >> >> good catch! >> _______________________________________________ >> Standards mailing list >> Info: https://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/standards >> Unsubscribe: standards-unsubscr...@xmpp.org >> _______________________________________________ >> >
_______________________________________________ Standards mailing list Info: https://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/standards Unsubscribe: standards-unsubscr...@xmpp.org _______________________________________________
