On 6/3/20 5:25 PM, Jonas Schäfer wrote:> Hi everyone, > > Flow and I got in a discussion about whether it is OK to add foreign, > namespaced elements to Registry entries.
I think registry entries should be just as extensible as the elements that are registered. This would also align nicely with the spirit of extensibility of XMPP. In this [1] particular example, it mimics how data form validation extend form fields on the wire protocol, at the registry layer. A situation where additional requirements and further information is only part of the textual specification and not of the registry entry, when it *could* be part of the entry, appears undesirable. - Florian 1: https://github.com/xsf/xeps/pull/949/files#diff-ebab582ef0efc48448fc287612a72d1dR208
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Standards mailing list Info: https://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/standards Unsubscribe: standards-unsubscr...@xmpp.org _______________________________________________
