Hey Sam, I'm a little worried about this, and how it squares with our IPR policies.
What do you feel can't be done within the XSF here? Dave. On Fri, 28 May 2021 at 15:31, Sam Whited <s...@samwhited.com> wrote: > Hi all, > > I'm doing another experiment with the office hours. Sometime in the > near future (currently 2021-06-08, but this may change) we're going to > try having a "working" session where we go through a list of XEPs > suggested by you all and write up recommendations for what should > happen to these XEPs. If we don't finish within an hour we will spread > it over multiple days. > > These recommendations won't be actual language or work on any specific > XEP but should be process things like "issue LC", "deprecate", > "obsolete", or "needs rewrite". We'll try to discuss each XEP and come > to consensus on what the future of it looks like, write it up in a > document along with our reasoning and any dissents if we can't come to > consensus, and then present the document to the council (who of course > may or may not choose to use it). > > If this sounds fun to anyone, please submit your ideas of XEPs that need > discussion and work before 08 June to the following list: > > https://pad.disroot.org/p/XSF_Modernization_Working_Group_Recommendations > > Consider setting a name for yourself before you edit and please keep the > list sorted. Thank you! > > —Sam > > -- > Sam Whited > _______________________________________________ > Standards mailing list > Info: https://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/standards > Unsubscribe: standards-unsubscr...@xmpp.org > _______________________________________________ >
_______________________________________________ Standards mailing list Info: https://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/standards Unsubscribe: standards-unsubscr...@xmpp.org _______________________________________________
