Well, on the other hand, since the only scenario I can imagine using <acknowledged/> in the wild has significantly different semantics from readdisplayed markers, I think that this is not really necessary in this XEP.
On Tue, 26 Mar 2024 at 17:34, Daniel Gultsch <dan...@gultsch.de> wrote: > On Tue, Mar 26, 2024 at 1:11 PM Dave Cridland <d...@cridland.net> wrote: > > > 3) It's really not. Some clients and intermediaries need to know whether > they should expect a marker or not. No need to check this prior to sending > a <markable/>, true, but useful to track missing markers afterward. > > > > Where was the discussion of this, and (more broadly) how does one know > what the discussion and rationale and consensus is if not on this list? > > I can add it back. When I showed this to people in the XSF room I > guess most people just considered the "does it hurt to > opportunistically include the <markable/>" side of things. > _______________________________________________ > Standards mailing list -- standards@xmpp.org > To unsubscribe send an email to standards-le...@xmpp.org >
_______________________________________________ Standards mailing list -- standards@xmpp.org To unsubscribe send an email to standards-le...@xmpp.org
