Thanks Peter,

A change to the specifications as per your suggestion has been prepared
here: https://github.com/xsf/xeps/pull/1362

Kind regards,

  Guus

On Wed, Jul 10, 2024 at 10:44 PM Peter Saint-Andre <stpe...@stpeter.im>
wrote:

> On 7/10/24 5:08 AM, Guus der Kinderen wrote:
> > Hello!
> >
> > Section 9.4 of XEP-0045 Multi-User Chat defines XMPP interaction when a
> > member of a room gets their membership removed. In the last few lines of
> > the section, the section describes how, in a  members-only room, the
> > affected user is to be removed from the room.
> >
> > Why does example 128 "Service Removes Non-Member" contain two stanzas
> > (their difference only being a 'actor' element)? See
> > https://xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0045.html#example-128
> > <https://xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0045.html#example-128>
>
> I think the we should have only once presence stanza in that example.
> IMHO it could include the actor element and the text above the example
> could say that the presence stanza MAY include the actor element. (In a
> members-only room, the actor element might be useful - "membership has
> its privileges" and that privilege is being taken away.)
>
> Peter
>
>
_______________________________________________
Standards mailing list -- standards@xmpp.org
To unsubscribe send an email to standards-le...@xmpp.org

Reply via email to