Hello, Le lundi 20 octobre 2025, 19:35:36 heure d’été d’Europe centrale Daniel Gultsch a écrit :
> Please consider the following questions during this Last Call and send > your feedback to the [email protected] discussion list: > > 1. Is this specification needed to fill gaps in the XMPP protocol > stack or to clarify an existing protocol? yes > 2. Does the specification solve the problem stated in the introduction > and requirements? yes > 3. Do you plan to implement this specification in your code? If not, > why not? No, it's a server side implementation, and I don't plan in close future to use the data provided. > 4. Do you have any security concerns related to this specification? They are already addressed in the XEP (Privacy Consideration). > 5. Is the specification accurate and clearly written? Yes, but I think that the field `var` should use Clark notation as requested by XEP-0068: it uses the existing form with the namespace `urn:xmpp:serverinfo:0` which comes from XEP-0157 and adds its own field `serverinfo-pubsub-node`. I think that `{urn:xmpp:serverinfo:0}pubsub-node` should be used instead. Regarding the fact that there are already implementations in the wild, it's probably not trivial to change at this stage, but on the other hand, the Last Call and potential move to "stable" is the right occasion. For the sake of pragmatism, it’s probably not a blocker for the move to "stable". Thank you. Best, Goffi
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Standards mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
