Now to the last call itself:

> 1. Is this specification needed to fill gaps in the XMPP protocol
> stack or to clarify an existing protocol?
Yes, absolutely. With the various channel-binding types available today, it 
wouldn't be possible to negotiating the right one without this XEP.

> 2. Does the specification solve the problem stated in the introduction
> and requirements?
Yes.

> 3. Do you plan to implement this specification in your code? If not,
> why not?
Already done in Monal.

> 4. Do you have any security concerns related to this specification?
No.

> 5. Is the specification accurate and clearly written?
In my opinion, yes, but it could provide a little more clarity on why the MUST 
for tls-server-end-point is necessary.

 
> Your feedback is appreciated!
> _______________________________________________
> Standards mailing list -- [email protected]
> To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]


_______________________________________________
Standards mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]

Reply via email to