Hi, I think some people worked on a new MUC spec. Maybe we can ask them to put the proposal online.
Regards On Fri, Jan 30, 2026, at 11:29, Goffi wrote: > Le vendredi 30 janvier 2026, 11:10:36 heure normale d’Europe centrale Stephen > Paul Weber a écrit : >> Somebody signing messages as Goffi wrote: >> >Le vendredi 30 janvier 2026, 10:52:31 heure normale d’Europe centrale > Stephen Paul Weber a écrit : >> >> >We don't have to be actively in the room. What we want when we are in a >> >> >large room, is to be able to check it when we want, and be notified when > we >> >> >are mentioned. >> >> >> >> So you want to have the option to not only not get presence live, but > also >> >> not get live messages? >> > >> >??? Why we would not have the live messages? If the client is in the room, > it's an "active" join, and it's working as usual. >> >> Yes but your whole proposal is about adding this "passive" join which I >> understood to not want live messages, correct? > > Yes, for rooms where the client is not actively displaying the chat, and you > get notifications when you are mentioned (or we can add another option to get > notification for every message, we still skip <presence> in this case). > > In short the room automatically get from "active" to "passive" when the > client > is not actively showing it and vice versa. > _______________________________________________ > Standards mailing list -- [email protected] > To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] > > Attachments: > * signature.asc _______________________________________________ Standards mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
