I have no clue why this matters (other than this is in color).
 
The phased array antennas used by Starlink are quite limited - in particular, 
there are 4 on each satellite and each earth-ground path is half-duplex, TDM, 
essentially. Limited by hardware. The problem of signal equalization and 
quantization limits prevent "space division multiplexing" and "frequency 
division multiplexing" in practice.
 
The 4 msec "turnaround time" at the physical level (satellite) means that time 
from a packet arriving at one end to be sent to the other end of the sat-dishy 
links gets worse the more dishys are served by one of the 4 antennas on the 
satellite. 

trying to increase the coverage of an individual satellite basically means 
serving more dishys per satellite, with less total bit rate, and much longer 
latency due to the half duplexness.
 
Now if the total bit rate of a sat-to-dishy link were, say, 1 Gigabit, like an 
802.11ac AP gives you, and the turnaround time were under 1 microsecond rather 
than 4 msec.  maybe then you could get reasonable Internet service to dishys.
 
But 240 Mb/s or 172 Mb/s as proposed for getting a bit more coverage per 
satellite? This is nowhere near competitive with what we expect in the US. 
 
Sorry to rain on all the techy dreaming.
 
First, it's worth looking at all the problems currently in WiFi performance 
when you share an AP with multiple active stations using 100's of Gb/s on the 
average (not just occasionally).
 
Dave - you tried in "make-wifi-fast", and the architecture gets in the way 
there. (yeah you can get point to point gigabit/sec single file transfers, but 
to do that you invoke features that destroy latency and introduce huge 
variability if you share the AP at all, for these reasons).
 
Starlink is a good "last resort" service as constituted. But fiber and last 
few-hundred meters wireless is SO much better able to deliver good Internet 
service scalably.
Even that assumes fixing the bufferbloat that the Starlink folks don't seem to 
be able to address...
_______________________________________________
Starlink mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/starlink

Reply via email to