> On Sep 29, 2022, at 09:50, Eugene Y Chang via Starlink > <[email protected]> wrote: > > Good point… that sure makes matching new capacity to new subscribers really > hard. [SM] Or easy: "just" add more satellites ;) some of the added capacity should also end up at new subscribers... SCNR Regards Sebastian > > Gene > ---------------------------------------------- > Eugene Chang > IEEE Senior Life Member > [email protected] > 781-799-0233 (in Honolulu) > > > >> On Sep 28, 2022, at 6:29 PM, David Lang <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> that strip of land is different every orbit, a given satellite doesn't pass >> over the same land each orbit. >> >> David Lang >> >> On Wed, 28 Sep 2022, Eugene Y Chang wrote: >> >>> Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2022 14:40:35 -1000 >>> From: Eugene Y Chang <[email protected]> >>> To: David Lang <[email protected]> >>> Cc: Eugene Chang <[email protected]>, Dotzero <[email protected]>, >>> Dave Taht via Starlink <[email protected]> >>> Subject: Re: [Starlink] Starlink "Best Effort" offering >>> Yes and no. >>> >>> Yes they can beef up the constellation, one section at a time. (For a given >>> launch, the are enhancing a particular orbit.) >>> >>> Depending on your definition of “one area” when you say “not in any one >>> area”. >>> Technically they would beef up an area in the shape of strips, where the >>> strip is the ground under the orbit of the additional (new) satellites. >>> >>> Sorry, when I say “add service to an area”, it implies adding coverage to >>> strips of land, the land under the new satellite orbit. >>> >>> https://satellitemap.space/?constellation=starlink >>> <https://satellitemap.space/?constellation=starlink> >>> >>> >>> Gene >>> ---------------------------------------------- >>> Eugene Chang >>> IEEE Senior Life Member >>> [email protected] >>> 781-799-0233 (in Honolulu) >>> >>> >>> >>>> On Sep 28, 2022, at 1:35 PM, David Lang <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>> The Starlink satellites are in low orbit (<90 min), so you beef up the >>>> contellation overall, not in any one area. >>>> >>>> David Lang >>>> >>>> On Wed, 28 Sep 2022, Eugene Y Chang via Starlink wrote: >>>> >>>>> Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2022 13:07:43 -1000 >>>>> From: Eugene Y Chang via Starlink <[email protected]> >>>>> Reply-To: Eugene Y Chang <[email protected]> >>>>> To: Dotzero <[email protected]> >>>>> Cc: Dave Taht via Starlink <[email protected]> >>>>> Subject: Re: [Starlink] Starlink "Best Effort" offering >>>>> What is the definition and differences between regular and best effort >>>>> service? >>>>> >>>>> Creating two bookings queue, wait list and best effort subscribers, the >>>>> best effort subscribers are more “real”. With that, treating best effort >>>>> subscribers as a (more) "real customer" backlog, it would be a good way >>>>> to prioritize where to expand the constellation (i.e. where to add >>>>> capacity). >>>>> >>>>> Gene >>>>> ---------------------------------------------- >>>>> Eugene Chang >>>>> IEEE Senior Life Member >>>>> [email protected] >>>>> 781-799-0233 (in Honolulu) >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> On Sep 28, 2022, at 9:53 AM, Dotzero via Starlink >>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> I've been on the wait list for almost 10 months and just received an >>>>>> email that I can sign up for a "best efforts" offering. Seeing as they >>>>>> also indicated the estimated time for regular service is mid-2023, I >>>>>> decided to go with it (You don't lose your place on the wait list). You >>>>>> can also "pause" the best effort service so I don't really have anything >>>>>> to lose. >>>>>> >>>>>> Has anyone had experience with this offering? Any input appreciated. If >>>>>> it makes a difference, location is Central East Ohio. >>>>>> >>>>>> According to >>>>>> https://www.starlink.com/legal/documents/DOC-1002-69942-69?regionCode=US >>>>>> <https://www.starlink.com/legal/documents/DOC-1002-69942-69?regionCode=US>, >>>>>> latency will be comparable to regular service, down will be 5-100mbs >>>>>> and up will be 1-10mps unless service is deprioritized due to congestion. >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks in advance. >>>>>> >>>>>> Mike >>>>>> >>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>> Starlink mailing list >>>>>> [email protected] >>>>>> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/starlink >>>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Starlink mailing list >>>> [email protected] >>>> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/starlink >>> > > _______________________________________________ > Starlink mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/starlink _______________________________________________ Starlink mailing list [email protected] https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/starlink
Re: [Starlink] Starlink "Best Effort" offering
Sebastian Moeller via Starlink Thu, 29 Sep 2022 02:11:00 -0700
- [Starlink] Starlink "Best Effort"... Dotzero via Starlink
- Re: [Starlink] Starlink "Best Ef... Dave Taht via Starlink
- Re: [Starlink] Starlink "Bes... Dotzero via Starlink
- Re: [Starlink] Starlink "... David Lang via Starlink
- Re: [Starlink] Starlink "... Dave Taht via Starlink
- Re: [Starlink] Starlink "Best Ef... Eugene Y Chang via Starlink
- Re: [Starlink] Starlink "Bes... David Lang via Starlink
- Re: [Starlink] Starlink "... Eugene Y Chang via Starlink
- Re: [Starlink] Starlink &... David Lang via Starlink
- Re: [Starlink] Starl... Eugene Y Chang via Starlink
- Re: [Starlink] S... Sebastian Moeller via Starlink
- Re: [Starlin... David Lang via Starlink
- Re: [Starlin... Eugene Y Chang via Starlink
- Re: [Starlin... Michael Richardson via Starlink
- Re: [Starlin... Nathan Owens via Starlink
- Re: [Starlin... Eugene Chang via Starlink
- Re: [Starlin... Nathan Owens via Starlink
- Re: [Starlin... Mike Puchol via Starlink
- Re: [Starlink] Starlink "Best Ef... rob currie via Starlink
- Re: [Starlink] Starlink "Bes... Eugene Chang via Starlink
