On 3/29/23 04:28, Sebastian Moeller via Starlink wrote:
Hi Bob,
On Mar 28, 2023, at 19:47, rjmcmahon <[email protected]> wrote:
Interesting. I'm skeptical that our cities in the U.S. can get this (structural
separation) right.
There really isn't that much to get wrong, you built the access network and terminate the
per household fibers in arge enough "exchanges" there you offer ISPs to lighten
up the fibers on the premise that customers can use any ISP they want (that is present in
the exchange)... and on ISP change will just be patched differently in the exchange.
While I think that local "government" also could successfully run internet
access services, I see no reason why they should do so (unless there is no competition).
The goal here is to move the "natural monopoly" of the access network out of the hand of
the "market" (as markets simply fail as optimizing resource allocation instruments under
mono- and oligopoly conditions, on either side).
We see the same issue in Canada: some provinces and cities happily
manage the delivery of services over cables hung from province-owned
poles (eg, TCP/IP in New Brunswick). Other provinces did less well, and
we have "telephone poles" and "hydro poles" on the same street (in
Toronto, Ontario)
There is no real difference between New Brunswick, Ontario or, for that
matter, Minnesota. If a province or city has operated natural monopolies
like the last mile for water and sewer, it can operate the last mile for
any other monopoly.
--dave
--
David Collier-Brown, | Always do right. This will gratify
System Programmer and Author | some people and astonish the rest
[email protected] | -- Mark Twain
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE AND DISCLAIMER : This telecommunication, including any
and all attachments, contains confidential information intended only for the
person(s) to whom it is addressed. Any dissemination, distribution, copying or
disclosure is strictly prohibited and is not a waiver of confidentiality. If
you have received this telecommunication in error, please notify the sender
immediately by return electronic mail and delete the message from your inbox
and deleted items folders. This telecommunication does not constitute an
express or implied agreement to conduct transactions by electronic means, nor
does it constitute a contract offer, a contract amendment or an acceptance of a
contract offer. Contract terms contained in this telecommunication are subject
to legal review and the completion of formal documentation and are not binding
until same is confirmed in writing and has been signed by an authorized
signatory.
_______________________________________________
Starlink mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/starlink
