The idea that "special purpose" features should be interposed or added to the
basic packet transport mechanisms continues to provoke people to suggest that
it's time for the "end of" end-to-end arguments in the Internet.
If one reads the initial paper, the reasons for NOT including "end to end
functions" in the underlying transport are quite clearly laid out, and have
nothing to do with any aspect of network technology that has changed in the
last 50 years.
So my answer is no.The primary sustaining reason is that the patterns of usage
of the Internet continue to evolve, so building in ANY special, limited purpose
functions beyond providing capacity and low latency into the packet and network
transport interferes with evolvability. (unless you plan to throw out the
entire infrastructure for every new application). This is pretty generally
true, but I suppose if one is building one-time-use weaponry that blows itself
up after a single standard use, evolvability doesn't matter.
The one thing that remains the same is that those who sell gear for networks
really want some kind of product differentiation beyond doing the things they
are supposed to do, well. And they are great at inventing plausible
sales-pitches. For example, Arista Networks has invented the need for massively
overbuffered Ethernet switches, and so has added bufferbloat introduction to
their sales pitch white papers. It's a cool feature to support massive queueing
delay as a "throughput enhancement", I understand. I'm sure they can con(vince)
a few customers that excessive buffering is good because, well, because they
are a hot startup.
The end-to-end argument doesn't say that putting really clever technology into
switches, routers, or into a distributed system (adding "smarts" to the core
functionality) is a bad idea. It says don't put functions that end-points
(overlaid on the packet routing and transport) can implement quite well into
the transport functionality.
DNS lookup is a great example, actually. Why put it into satellite based
routing and transport? It works fine, and it is currently ground based.
Such
_______________________________________________
Starlink mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/starlink
