On Thu, Aug 7, 2008 at 7:02 PM, Michael DeHaan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Steven W. Carter wrote:
>
>> Now that Cobbler is getting to a more finalized and stable configuration,
>> we should resume development and discussion on the Stateless Linux project.
>>
>> Is there anything in particular that needs to be addressed that is
>> blocking further development on this?  I'm extremely interested in this
>> project and I believe that it has a lot of value in almost all fields of
>> distributed computing.
>>
>> ~Steven
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Stateless-list mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/stateless-list
>>
>>
>
> I don't believe Cobbler was really a roadblock before -- I just haven't
> seen a lot of traffic on this list -- no one ever raised such issues to me.
>  That being said, if there is interest in getting Stateless going again,
> great.    While I can't speak for who is working on this project now (nor
> have I been really tracking things), but would like to help however I can
> from the Cobbler side if there are features you'd like to see added and
> would be glad to see this move forward.
> You can also join the mailing list here:
> https://fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/cobbler, also #cobbler on
> freenode.


I use cobbler to provision xen guests and perceus (http://www.perceus.org)
to provision stateless images on nodes of hpc clusters, which are probably
different from thin clients only in the use they are given :). From where I
stand, it would be great if cobbler could manage something similar (I guess
that's why I'm on both these lists :) )


>
>
> --Michael
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Stateless-list mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/stateless-list
>
_______________________________________________
Stateless-list mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/stateless-list

Reply via email to