On Sat, 3 Oct 2009 11:46:44 +0530 Shashi <[email protected]> wrote:
> Getting smarter, if > the links is thisbloghasalongname.wordpress.com/2009/09/09/post.html > rendering it as "thisblogh…" will make less sense than making it > "http://th…"; This can also be made optional in the "others" settings > tab. Oranges are not the only fruit, and HTTP is not the only online protocol. > > So, the upsides: > > 1. You don't have to rely on url circumcising services. Heh – can we make that a meme? :) > > And the downsides: > > 1. The plain-text raw content of the post (which is used in the api > and other places) will be greater than 140 chars (may be any length!) > But there is no way to stop this without resorting to url shorteners. > 2. Hmm... Anyone? > 2. It would break compatibility with that other microblogging service. I don't personally care, but … If I knew the architecture better, I would probably think of more. Cheers _______________________________________________ StatusNet-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.status.net/mailman/listinfo/statusnet-dev
