On 6/10/2009, at 4:05, Evan Prodromou <[email protected]> wrote:
I'd like to make the following fine-tuning changes to !groups in
0.9.x:
If you mention a !group, even if the notice is not distributed to
the group, the name gets linkified as a tag.
Also change to #? otherwise people who thought they were in the group
but really aren't may never notice. Same for when the group doesn't
exist yet. Maybe we can give a warning as the notice is saved.
At the group admins' discretion, non-members can be allowed to post
to a group. The default is set by the site admin. Example use case:
a !support group for asking for tech support on identi.ca.
At the site admin's discretion, groups can share the same (logical)
namespace as users. In this case, you can't have a group named "foo"
and a user named "foo".
Sounds excellent. The migration scripts will be fun to write.
At the site admin's discretion, "@name" will send a group message,
just like !group. (This will clearly work best when there's no
confusion whether "@name" is for a user named "name" or a group
named "name" -- that is, when 3 is enabled.)
-Evan
--
Evan Prodromou
CEO, StatusNet, Inc.
[email protected] - http://identi.ca/evan - +1-514-554-3826
_______________________________________________
StatusNet-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.status.net/mailman/listinfo/statusnet-dev
_______________________________________________
StatusNet-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.status.net/mailman/listinfo/statusnet-dev
