I love the sandbox idea - we can isolate the impact but not the user and give them a second chance.
The silence feature is perfect for a large site with volunteer moderators - they will be able to sandbox or/silence someone based on rules but not delete. That allows the admins to review the issue and do the delete. Basically this could mirror the options large IRC sites use: de-voice (sandbox), kick (silence), ban (delete) well, I guess it comes close ;) On Fri, Oct 9, 2009 at 15:06, hellekin =8) <[email protected]> wrote: > On Fri 2009-10...@13:42:20 -0400, Keith Erskine wrote: >> The Sandbox is a great idea - it gives problem members a time-out where they >> can get right with their community. I think the Silence isn't necessary, >> especially if you could put a notice on the offender's view of the site; >> picture of kid in corner, dog in dog house, etc.. >> >> - Keith >> > *** I have to disagree on the Silence idea. I think it's a very good feature > to be able to completely suspend an account without deleting it. You never > know. > > == > hk > > -- > . . > . xmpp:[email protected] . > . 13B8 6597 AE68 B329 AB33 7BBA ABAD C66C 3F25 A706 . > . Slow down! You've got no time to lose! . > . . > _______________________________________________ > StatusNet-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.status.net/mailman/listinfo/statusnet-dev > -- --- Bear [email protected] (work) [email protected] (jabber & email) http://code-bear.com/bearlog (weblog) PGP Fingerprint = 9996 719F 973D B11B E111 D770 9331 E822 40B3 CD29 _______________________________________________ StatusNet-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.status.net/mailman/listinfo/statusnet-dev
