On 17 Dec 2009, at 15:19, Brion Vibber wrote:
Is it best to drop the holdsAccount entirely, or provide both entries for compatibility with any clients that might already be using this information?
fwiw, FOAF continues to contain holdsAccount but it's marked as 'archaic'.
Libby _______________________________________________ StatusNet-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.status.net/mailman/listinfo/statusnet-dev
