+1 for the group+groupn...@hostname, or group.groupn...@hostname On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 11:19 AM, Brion Vibber <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 04/06/2010 10:47 AM, Eric Helgeson wrote: > > Is there a limit on chars it can contain? > > Why not: > [email protected] <%[email protected]> or > #[email protected] <%[email protected]> > > Seems more natural but may be a tech limitation I'm not aware of. > > > As far as I can tell from > http://code.google.com/p/webfinger/wiki/WebFingerProtocol the address > should simply be validated/normalized as an email address, in which case # > and ! should indeed be valid chars for use in the local part of the address. > > Might be problems with #[email protected] in particular... may need to make > sure we consistently manage escaping going to/from acct: URLs. > > > return parse_url('acct:[email protected] <acct:%[email protected]>'); > array ( > 'scheme' => 'acct', > 'path' => '[email protected]', # good > ) > > > return parse_url('acct:#[email protected]'); > array ( > 'scheme' => 'acct', > 'fragment' => '[email protected]', # bad! > ) > > -- brion > > _______________________________________________ > StatusNet-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.status.net/mailman/listinfo/statusnet-dev > -- Everyone Loves Tea http://www.everyonelovestea.com
_______________________________________________ StatusNet-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.status.net/mailman/listinfo/statusnet-dev
