On Tue, Jan 10, 2006 at 09:39:39AM -0700, Martin Sebor wrote: > It is now :) Let me add it to Jira: > http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STDCXX-111 > > It looks like Apple decided to get rid of libsupc++ in their gcc 4. > I just hope they didn't integrate it into libstdc++ -- that would > prevent programs from linking with third party implementations of > the C++ Standard Library (such as STDCXX) due ODR violations (i.e., > due to both libraries containing their own definitions of the same > symbols).
How can I help figure out what's going on? > FWIW, we have only very recently (last week, in fact) tried to build > on OS X. Andrew has filed a bunch of issues for the problems that he > has uncovered so far -- see > http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?requestId=12310512 I saw those - they mostly looked like Mac OS X 10.2 issues - which is a long dead platform. =) > Since several of them are involved and would require us to recertify > the library on all the platforms where it has passed my goal is to get > them fixed in 4.1.4. Does that sound reasonable? Sure. Let's just note that Mac OS X isn't supported in the release notes. I will test the release on Solaris when I get a chance and report back. > >Finally, not a showstopper, but it'd be *really* nice if etc/config/README > >were moved to the top-level directory. =) -- justin > > I agree. Let me add an issue for it: > http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STDCXX-112 Excellent. =) -- justin
