> -----Original Message----- > From: Martin Sebor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, March 12, 2007 8:34 PM > To: stdcxx-dev@incubator.apache.org > Subject: Re: RFC: stdcxx 4.2 platforms > > > I would find Cygwin test results helpful. It would also be > helpful do semi-regular builds of some popular C++ software > with stdcxx (like boost) and post the results. > > I agree that building Boost (and perhaps other popular > packages as well) would be a useful enhancement to the stdcxx > test suite. > The problem is first of all porting Boost to stdcxx (i.e., > getting the infrastructure to work), and then also the cycles > involved in running the Boost test suite and analyzing the > test results. I suppose if someone were to volunteer to do > the first pass (i.e., get the Boost infrastructure ported and > help analyze the first set of results) we could then add it > to our automated test infrastructure and run it perhaps not > every night but maybe weekly or monthly and handle the > maintenance of the project.
I would like to do that, if there is no objection. Farid.
