On Wed, 2007-03-28 at 19:33 +0300, Farid Zaripov wrote: > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Martin Sebor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Wednesday, March 28, 2007 7:12 PM > > To: stdcxx-dev@incubator.apache.org > > Subject: problems with new list tests > > > > I've been working on cleaning up our test results across the > > board with the hope of stabilizing things enough to cut a > > preliminary 4.2 [pre]release branch sometime soon. Last > > night's results contain a number of new failures on several > > platforms introduced by the just committed list tests. I'd > > like to clean these up before we move on. I put together a > > high-level overview to help us focus on the problem > > platforms. Farid, please look at the results to see if > > something obvious jumps out at you. Once you're done with the > > changes on your platforms I'll get to work on the rest. > > > > IBM VAC++/XLC++ results not available or not meaningful > > HP aCC/IPF all tests die with SIGABRT > > HP aCC/PA 4 tests fail to compile, one gets SIGBUS > > SGI MIPSpro OK > > gcc/Linux OK > > Sun C++/SPARC 23.list.cons dies with SIGABRT > > MSVC/Windows OK > > Compaq C++/Tru64 all tests fail to compile or link > > > > Four tests failed to compile due to static inline issue. > Fixed thus: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=523397
Great! Can you think of a reason for any of the other failures? if not off the top of your head, do you want to look into it or should I go ahead? Martin
