Okay, after some initial technical difficulties (sorry about the messed up submissions) I opened two issues:
22.locale.money.get.cpp doesn't test international monetary formats (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STDCXX-413) and money_get fails to parse currency in international format (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STDCXX-412). -- Mark > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Sat, 12 May 2007 15:42:16 -0600 > To: stdcxx-dev@incubator.apache.org > Subject: Re: svn commit: r537492 - > /incubator/stdcxx/trunk/doc/stdlibref/money-get.html > > Mark Brown wrote: >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> Sent: Sat, 12 May 2007 14:09:34 -0600 >>> To: stdcxx-dev@incubator.apache.org >>> Subject: Re: svn commit: r537492 - >>> /incubator/stdcxx/trunk/doc/stdlibref/money-get.html >>> >>> Mark Brown wrote: >>>> Martin, >>>> >>>> Thanks for fixing it! I have a question about the new code: Could you >>>> show an example of an international monetary string that would be >>>> correctly parsed by the facet? I tried a few but none of them could be >>>> parsed. For instance, "USD 1234" gives this output: >>>> USD 1234 --> "" --> 0 >>>> The same happens with g++ and STLport so I suspect I must be doing >>>> something wrong. Removing the space between the currency symbol and >>>> the >>>> number didn't make a difference. >>> Hmm, I guess I should have tested the internationalized behavior before >>> I put it in. I think the code is correct as is and your input should be >>> correctly parsed by the facet (and produce 1234 on output). I'm not >>> sure >>> what's going on. Stepping through the code it looks like the money_get >>> facet ends up retrieving the wrong specialization of moneypunct, i.e., >>> moneypunct<char, false> when it needs moneypunct<char, true>. What's >>> puzzling is that both libstdc++ and STLport behave the same. It seems >>> like too much of a coincidence for all three implementations to suffer >>> from the same bug. >>> >>> In any event, thanks for bringing it to our attention! Can you open an >>> issue for this as well so we don't forget to investigate it in case I >>> don't get around to it soon? >> >> I can certainly do that. I should also mention that while investigating >> this problem I found a test that's supposed to test this functionality: >> 22.locale.money.get.cpp. The test fails 20 out of 1934 assertions but >> none of them look like they have anything to do with parsing >> international monetary values. It doesn't look like they are being >> tested at all... > > Yeah, I noticed it too. I'm in the process of enhancing the test to > exercise the international formats as well. If you don't mind creating > another issue for the test, just for tracking purposes, that would be > swell! > > Martin ____________________________________________________________ GET FREE 5GB ONLINE STORAGE - Safely store your documents, photos and music online! Visit http://www.inbox.com/storage to find out more!
