William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: > * I'm qurious about http://incubator.apache.org/stdcxx/#committers. > Why some people are following CTR and others RTC? > > quoting that page > "Stdcxx Committers are Developers with commit (or write) access to the stdcxx > codebase. Except where noted, all stdcxx committers follow the > Review-Then-Commit policy. The list of current committers in alphabetical > order > is below:" > > I think this is a misunderstanding, but perhaps worse. The statement is that > except where there is C-T-R code bases, svn operates under R-T-C. I don't > believe this was ment to apply to individuals, please correct me if I'm wrong.
Having read this more closely, I see the comment next to sebor. My bad. This isn't acceptable, in that each Project/Podling of the ASF operates as a committee of equals. Therefore this isn't a legitimate distinction. STDCXX, would you rather operate entirely R-T-C, or C-T-R, for trunk? You can certainly call out *subversion* repositories or subsets that operate differently, but again with the same rule applied to each committer. Bill
