I suppose I should cast my own vote on this...
Martin Sebor wrote:
I think the discussion has wound down so let's have a vote and
decide whether stdcxx committers should follow the Commit-Then
Review (CTR) or Review-Then-Commit (RTC) policy on stdcxx/trunk
by default.
[+1] All committers follow Commit-Then-Review for safe changes,
Review-Then-Commit for potentially breaking changes. What
constitutes a breakng change is a judgment call to be made
by each committer. The rule of thumb is that changes which
involve advanced/sophisticated C++ features, C99 features,
or optional POSIX (and other) extensions may cause breakage
on some platforms.
[ -1] All committers follow Review-Then-Commit for all changes
with no exceptions.
[+0] New committers and committers who haven't been active in
more than [5] months follow the RTC policy for at least
[4] weeks of sustained activity, all others CTR.
Please check the box you're voting for (or put +1/-1 in any or
all of them). When voting for #3, also put numbers in the two
[ ] boxes to complete the rules.
Martin