> -----Original Message----- > From: Martin Sebor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, June 21, 2007 8:56 PM > To: stdcxx-dev@incubator.apache.org > Subject: Re: STDCXX examples fails and reasons [MSVC]
[...] > time_get looks like a bug (or lack of functionality) in our library time_get::date_order() returns time_get::do_date_order() which always returns dateorder () == no_order (loc/_time_get.h; line 137). Also I observed that time_get::~time_get() should be protected (22.2.5.1), but in our library the time_get::~time_get() is not declared/defined. The same situation with ~time_get_byname(), ~time_put(), ~time_put_byname(). Farid.
