[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: faridz
Date: Wed Oct 24 05:22:17 2007
New Revision: 587873
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=587873&view=rev
[...]
@@ -137,10 +138,10 @@
#endif // _RWSTD_INT64_T
- std::pair<_RWSTD_INT8_T*, std::ptrdiff_t> buf0;
- std::pair<_RWSTD_INT16_T*, std::ptrdiff_t> buf1;
- std::pair<_RWSTD_INT32_T*, std::ptrdiff_t> buf2;
- std::pair<Type64*, std::ptrdiff_t> buf3;
+ std::pair<_RWSTD_INT8_T*, std::ptrdiff_t> buf0 (0, 0);
+ std::pair<_RWSTD_INT16_T*, std::ptrdiff_t> buf1 (0, 0);
+ std::pair<_RWSTD_INT32_T*, std::ptrdiff_t> buf2 (0, 0);
+ std::pair<Type64*, std::ptrdiff_t> buf3 (0, 0);
Why is this necessary? Shouldn't the default ctor zero out
(i.e., default-initialize) its members?
Is this is a workaround for a compiler bug? (If so, which one?)
Martin
